This analysis is incorrect.
@resist_berlin your data source falsely inflates electricity usage data.
@rizzn Linking to your own article (which btw is not readily available) is not very good practice. What is the point of such a report, commissioned by someone inside the cryptocurrency-biz? That is clearly not impartial analysis.
@resist_berlin would you prefer I copy and paste a full text of the report here?
It is readily available.
If you're not able to read it, that says more about you than me.
@rizzn I needlessly have to provide an e-mail address to access the article. Why don't you provide a direct link to the PDF and toot it here, if it contains valuable analysis?
I mean, I would even encourage you to do so, for the sake of transparency. The source for the other figures at least describes their methodology in detail.
@rizzn Also there is this peer-reviewed article now:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542435118301776
Which is also available for direct download. I'm not saying that their numbers or their methodology is infallible, but at least they provide lots of background information.
@resist_berlin it's all based on the same data set.
Look, read it or not. I don't care.
@rizzn That's fine, I just noticed that people have a tendency there of claiming the numbers are incorrect and then failing to back up their claim. Whatever. 
@rizzn Care to explain why?