mastodon.top est l'un des nombreux serveurs Mastodon indépendants que vous pouvez utiliser pour participer au fédiverse.
Mastodon.top est une instance francophone stable, régulièrement mise à jour et accessible à tous hébergée par VirtuBox

Statistiques du serveur :

1,3K
comptes actifs

#PierrePoilievre

38 messages33 participants0 message aujourd’hui
Suite du fil

The fascist right's war on trans existence is both opportunistic and ideological, and as such it is not bound by imaginary lines on a map. As this piece notes, the all-too-often bipartisan support of an anti-trans pogrom in both the US and Britain is having a distorting effect on Canadian politics as that country approaches its federal election.

xtramagazine.com/power/politic

We must be ready to counter the right’s obsession with trans people

"The 2025 Canadian federal election campaign is underway, and it arrives in a moment where it seems like conservative media and politicians just can’t get enough of trans people. They’re seemingly addicted to discourse about pronouns and bathroom access. They’re fixated on high school girls’ volleyball, gender markers on passports, puberty blocker prescriptions or even haircuts. They accuse their opponents of forcing “radical gender ideology” onto young people, as they strip away peoples’ rights to healthcare and self-identification.

The first part of this century saw progressive politicians campaign on expanding LGBTQ2S+ rights—see: Obama-era expansions to marriage equality or Canada-wide “X” gender markers—while their right-wing opponents largely remained silent. But the script has flipped. Now, Donald Trump has won an election on the back of campaign ads like “Kamala is for they/them” and turned questions about the very existence of trans people into a Day One executive order. We’ve seen bad science like the Cass Review in the U.K. guide public health policy in that country and beyond, and U.K. prime minister Keir Starmer campaign on restricting trans women from women’s spaces. Yes, the current anti-trans movement was born in the United Kingdom and United States, but make no mistake: it has found roots in Canada too.

Conservative Party of Canada leader Pierre Poilievre has embraced much of the anti-trans discourse from abroad. Last year, he spoke out against puberty blockers for young people and trans women in women’s spaces, arguing that “female spaces should be exclusively for females, not for ‘biological males.’” And this January, following Trump’s inauguration, he parroted the U.S. president’s stance about being aware of “only two genders.”

Reading this piece through the lens our present anti-trans context in America was difficult, because it reminded me of a time only years ago when the anti-trans pogrom and the fascist right's obsession with genitalia was still a marginal issue and our society, spurned on by an establishment that doesn't give a damn about trans people, missed a golden opportunity to stand up for trans rights and shove these weird naiz underpants police into the proverbial locker. Although I won't claim the Canadian ruling class cares any more for trans lives than the UK and US establishments do, it's very clear to me that the reason Canadian public figures in the fascist movement have to play a double game of admission and denial around the subject of trans rights is because the political establishment in Canada has at least made a stab at defending trans people's right to exist in society; with the exception of s few governments in fascist controlled areas. Indeed as recently as the fall of 2024, three "conservative" parties in Canada fought provincial elections on the back of anti-trans propaganda and all three of them lost.

This contrasts of course with the British and US experience, which has seen bipartisan support for anti-trans policies and the complete surrender of the mainstream "liberal" center on the issue of trans rights. This capitulation to fascist arguments about why trans people don't deserve the same medical and participatory rights as cis people do has in turn not only accelerated the anti-trans pogrom, but perversely allowed fascist political movements to win entire elections on the backs of drummed up moral panics about trans people. The Canadian example, so far, demonstrates that the only way forward that doesn't end in both trans eliminationist politics and victory for fascist political forces at the ballot box, is to fight back against the anti-trans narratives driving these moral panics. Which is probably a lesson we shouldn't have to learn from Canada in the US at least, because our fascists were losing elections fought on these subjects too until the liberal establishment decided to abandon trans people to our present fate.

Of course, I would strongly advise Canadians not to get too confident in their country's support for trans rights, precisely because of our American experience. If the rise of the anti-trans pogrom that helped put Trump in office did nothing else, it demonstrated that these freaks aren't going to just go away because they lost the debate on trans rights a few times; it takes constant vigilance and pushback to keep these nazis in the weirdo genital inspector box where they belong.

Archived: archive.ph/vhZKV

A collage on a black background that includes the Canadian parliament buildings, Trans Rights signs and eyes. The building is in black and white; everything else is in pink.
Xtra Magazine · We must be ready to counter the right’s obsession with trans people | Xtra MagazineANALYSIS: Conservatives have shown they’re willing to make trans rights a wedge issue. Progressives can’t just stand by and watch
#Fascism#Trump#Canada
Suite du fil

I've been saying for a while that the policy differences between #PierrePoilievre and #MarkCarney are minor: impose countervailing tariffs on the US, lower interprovincial trade barriers, abolish the consumer carbon tax, eliminate the GST on new homes, build an energy corridor, cut income taxes, spend more on defence, etc. (It's good to see a Liberal sing from the Conservative songbook, though is his heart in it?)

Possibly the most important difference is #crime.

1/3

A répondu dans un fil de discussion

@Snowshadow

Not to mention Poilievre was spreading misinformation. The only plastic bags that are banned, as per the regulations are:

“Checkout bags designed to carry purchased goods from a business and typically given to a customer at the retail point of sale.”

canada.ca/en/environment-clima

But of course like so much he says, it’s not true but bordering on the truth.

www.canada.caSingle-use Plastics Prohibition Regulations: Overview - Canada.ca

"In the Before Times, when a politician (or corporate leader) used to have to exchange credible arguments with a member of the media in return for access to the distribution network of their publication or broadcast, serious conversations were par for the course. It wasn’t perfect, no, but it was an adult time."

readtheline.ca/p/andrew-macdou

I heard Rosemary Barton lament last night that neither #MarkCarney nor #PierrePoilievre are booked for an interview with her.

#media #politics
#TheLineCa

The Line · Andrew MacDougall: We need adults keeping tabs on our politicians againPar Line Editor
Suite du fil

Lastly, the Canadian federal election is on April 28. @thetyee’s John MacLachlan Gray writes about wannabe Prime Minister Pierre Poilievre, aka Skippy.

“Politics may have nothing to do with morals, but even Machiavelli thinks that there comes a time in a country’s history when politics are not enough: when a leader is called upon to exemplify what it means to be — in this instance — a Canadian. And frankly I don’t think Skippy has given this much thought.”

thetyee.ca/Opinion/2025/04/17/

#Canada #CanPoli #PierrePoilievre #CdnElxn2025 #Newstodon #NewstodonFriday #FollowFriday

15/15